Tuesday, January 14, 2020
CHEAP WINE
The wife and I took a trip to Napa, California some years ago. We had a great time visiting wineries, eating wonderful food and experiencing the Wine Train. I couldn’t help, however, that I felt out of place. No matter where one turns in Napa, one hears people singing the praises of various wines. Where I get the feeling that I’m an outsider is when hearing or reading about descriptions of a particular wine (“it has shades of apricot accented with light hints of grapefruit”). To me, it just tastes like, well, wine.
That stated, I’ve always gravitated toward wines that are placed in the section of the store deemed the “economy section” next to the Old Milwaukee and down the aisle from the generic cheese doodles. In these wines one cannot discern hints of apricot or grapefruit, just undertones of potato peelings. Despite misgiving that people have about economy wines, after years of experience I can attest to the fact that one can get used to their taste. Mind you that socially you become a bit of an outcast when showing up at a party with a 1.5 liter bottle of Lancer’s Rosé. On the bright side, usually you can go home with most of the contents of the bottle intact.
Thus, after 35 years with the wife who has quaffed numerous bottles of cheap wine with me, she told me something that shocked me to my very core. She told me that she discovered a love of more expensive wines. The reason for this is that “they don’t give me a headache and acid reflux.”
Now I’ve heard it all.
In simple economic terms, one can offset the offensive effects of a $3 bottle of wine with a few Advil and a handful of Tums which may set you back a total of 25¢.
And that’s still a heck of a lot cheaper than an expensive $3.75 bottle of wine.
Readers, enjoy your day.
Saturday, November 9, 2019
HOBBIES FOR OLD FARTS
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
"CASE QUEEN"
Saturday, June 15, 2019
NIGHTMARES
The dreams that I normally experience are the kind and gentle variety - walking calmly through a wooded area, skiing on a bright sunny day, or other pleasant experiences. I think that, before the past few weeks, the worst dream I've ever had involved being chased by Ethel Merman wielding a hockey stick while singing "There's No Business Like Show Business".
My mother's philosophy about nightmares was that they're caused by eating Italian food. I've never believed that but always think about it while eating a large pizza.
Of late I've had the absolute worst nightmares - the type that you wake up in a cold sweat wanting to scream. The misery and suffering in these nightmares is indescribable. Blood, guts, gore, murder, sleazy lawyers, guns, police chases, addiction, death, insanity, poverty, revenge and suicide. An that's only about half of it.
I can barely stand the thought of closing my eyes at night.
But, enough of that.
In an unrelated matter, the wife and I have finally subscribed to Netflix. We've binge-watched all 62 episodes of Breaking Bad in the past two weeks.
Readers, enjoy your day.
Monday, April 15, 2019
DOGGERS AND HORSERS
I do a fair amount of bicycling which I find very enjoyable. To me, there is nothing quite like getting on my bike and enjoying the freedom and physical activity that a bicycle provides. Of course, with most things, part of the act of riding a bike involves the sharing of a roadway or trail. Where I live we have a trail that is an old railroad route that has been converted into a biking/walking path. It is a wonderful path with sections of forest, coastal and urban landscapes that is enjoyed by many of our local folks as well as visitors. On any given day one may find oneself sharing the trail with other cyclists as well as walkers, bird watchers, geocachers, dog walkers and equestrians.
The latter two groups ("doggers" & "horsers") are an interesting study. Doggers are mostly simple folks while Horsers are clearly more well-heeled. Doggers are warned to pick up after their dogs do their business along the trail. Most of them willingly comply rather than face a steep financial penalty if caught by the authorities. Horsers are not subject to the same rules of courtesy and animal sanitation.
So, let's get this straight. If you walk your 1.5 pound Yorkshire Terrier on the path and he/she decides it's time for [you know], the Dogger can be fined in excess of $100 should he or she not pickup the offending mass which is roughly the size of a peanut M&M. On the other hand, a Horser can simply trot away from his/her horse's ten-pound turd without a care in the world. Weeks later, that same mass will remain in-place (absent fewer flies, to be sure).
Thus, our public trail (thank goodness) is free of the offensive canine leave-behinds but is unfortunately covered with massive piles of horse poo.
In a way, I can understand this. Let's face it, an equestrian is looking generally forward over the horse's head and (for the sake of safety and general inconvenience) is not really concerned as to what the posterior of the animal is up to.
Despite these realities, it doesn't change the fact that the rest of the poor, huddled masses who use the trail have to dodge, ride through or step on huge piles of horse dung.
It does beg the question: why are horsers exempt from the rules to which the rest of the trail users must adhere?
Think about it.
Readers, enjoy your day.
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
AN ADVENTURE IN MOVING
Picture this: you're driving down the interstate heading somewhere (it doesn't matter where). Ahead you see one of the ubiquitous U-Haul trailers that litter the highways. Emblazoned on the back, sides and probably the top of the trailer are the words "An Adventure in Moving".
Anyone who has ever moved would be annoyed by these words. You see, moving may be a lot of things but an "adventure"? Naw. Maybe that's why U-Haul ditched the phrase some years ago.
Truth be known, the wife and I are in the midst of a move, - "relocation", if you will. It is (get this) our ninth move in 35 years of marriage.
That averages out to less than four years per dwelling. That's really sick. There are people in witness relocation programs who have moved fewer times than we have.
On the flip side, in our many moves we have lived in the plains, mountains, desert and along the coast. We have enjoyed the company of some amazing and interesting friends, eaten some incredible local food and seen a variety of places that few others have seen.
Yes, at times the moves themselves have been pretty miserable. But, admittedly, U-Haul may have a point.
Moving is, indeed, an adventure.
Readers, enjoy your day.
Friday, March 1, 2019
"FAMILY" PET
The wife and I lost our dog "Scooter" last June. We bid goodbye to him when we learned that he was suffering from cancer. Please keep in mind before you read further that this will not be one of those sad tales about how a pet is taken away from this earth way too early, blah, blah, blah.
This story is about a practice that otherwise well-meaning people commonly do after people experience the loss of a pet.
Since we lost Scooter, we have been asked one or more of the following questions on numerous occasions:
First, the probing, uncertain question:
"Are you going to have another dog?"
Next, the nearly foregone conclusion question:
"When are you going to have another dog?"
Lastly, the it's going to happen for sure question:
"When you do have another dog, what kind of dog will you have?'"
Let's think for a moment of how most pet lovers view their pets. Pets are part of their families. That said, a pet, albeit to a lesser degree, occupies a place in a family not dissimilar to that of its prime members (husbands, wives, siblings, etc.).
Now, think about a man who has lost a loved one, a family member - a wife, for example. Let's substitute the word "wife" in the previous three commonly-asked questions and see how that feels:
"Are you going to have another wife?"
"When are you going to have another wife?"
"When you do have another wife, what kind of wife will you have?"
Sounds pretty cruel, doesn't it?
Readers, enjoy your day.